|
POV #2
Jun 2, 2008 22:59:51 GMT -5
Post by Assistant Executive Producer on Jun 2, 2008 22:59:51 GMT -5
no, everyone is just going to ignore your lame ass.........LMFAO
|
|
|
POV #2
Jun 2, 2008 23:01:59 GMT -5
Post by jamar643 on Jun 2, 2008 23:01:59 GMT -5
MY ARGUMENT IS LEGITIMATE
|
|
|
POV #2
Jun 2, 2008 23:08:55 GMT -5
Post by Assistant Executive Producer on Jun 2, 2008 23:08:55 GMT -5
No it's not...you lost fair and square....you can see the posts. Nick had more than you. It doesn't take an idiot to see that.
|
|
Scott
Houseguests
Posts: 169
|
POV #2
Jun 2, 2008 23:11:25 GMT -5
Post by Scott on Jun 2, 2008 23:11:25 GMT -5
wow ok well here are my 2 cents worth of crap.. one I dont think the game is rigged... I dont thing the host has anyone in mind to win or play favs.. sorry Jamar buddy but this is NOT a rigged game second I do think it was not right or fair to the rest of us that Nick was brought back so fast or well at all. he was evicted ... why not bring them all back? I feel that when your evicted you got to jury or somewhere... only come back if inactive players are evicted by Big Brother ... then the most active one can come back but Nick back is NOT right
|
|
|
POV #2
Jun 2, 2008 23:11:51 GMT -5
Post by jamar643 on Jun 2, 2008 23:11:51 GMT -5
the host even said you didn't have to post the most to win numbnuts this game is bs ya'll have it rigged for nick to win
|
|
|
POV #2
Jun 2, 2008 23:13:22 GMT -5
Post by Britti on Jun 2, 2008 23:13:22 GMT -5
*feels like she shouldnt be in the game still then*
|
|
|
POV #2
Jun 2, 2008 23:13:38 GMT -5
Post by Assistant Executive Producer on Jun 2, 2008 23:13:38 GMT -5
no it didn't matter that he had more posts...but your odds are if you post more than you have more of a shot. AND you didn't even start right away, so it's your own fault!
|
|
|
POV #2
Jun 2, 2008 23:16:20 GMT -5
Post by jamar643 on Jun 2, 2008 23:16:20 GMT -5
see my argument is legit because people are agreeing that he was brought back too fast
|
|
Scott
Houseguests
Posts: 169
|
POV #2
Jun 2, 2008 23:17:54 GMT -5
Post by Scott on Jun 2, 2008 23:17:54 GMT -5
he shouldnt been brought back at all or at least this fast
|
|
Scott
Houseguests
Posts: 169
|
POV #2
Jun 2, 2008 23:18:29 GMT -5
Post by Scott on Jun 2, 2008 23:18:29 GMT -5
ok AEP why was Nick brougt back in the game?
|
|
|
POV #2
Jun 2, 2008 23:19:11 GMT -5
Post by Assistant Executive Producer on Jun 2, 2008 23:19:11 GMT -5
Jamar you can complain, whine, cry all you want, all it's doing is stirring up drama and that's what I like! You are making tonight very entertaining for us hosts. LOL Just very entertaining, you probably don't realize how many people are laughing at you right now.
|
|
Scott
Houseguests
Posts: 169
|
POV #2
Jun 2, 2008 23:19:22 GMT -5
Post by Scott on Jun 2, 2008 23:19:22 GMT -5
*feels like she shouldnt be in the game still then* Britti who is she?
|
|
|
POV #2
Jun 2, 2008 23:19:38 GMT -5
Post by claire on Jun 2, 2008 23:19:38 GMT -5
hey guys, newsflash we voted him and britti back in the game stop complaining
|
|
|
POV #2
Jun 2, 2008 23:23:59 GMT -5
Post by Vince on Jun 2, 2008 23:23:59 GMT -5
Jared, I don't think anyone is agreeing with you about it being rigged, I think he won it fair too.
And another thing, if everyone is agreeing with you about Nick, that means he is going to be gone soon anyway. He can't keep winning POVs every week. So just don't worry about it.
|
|
|
POV #2
Jun 2, 2008 23:24:01 GMT -5
Post by ginny on Jun 2, 2008 23:24:01 GMT -5
Britti was voted back in at the same time as Nick. Key word is VOTED. Victoria could've come back but houseguests VOTED for Nick and Britti instead. If you have a problem with Nick you have a problem with Britti! BB please don't let whiners dictate how you run your game!
|
|